Stop a Recession From Wrecking Your Finances by Putting Your Money Here

Google has proposed sweeping changes to its Play Store and advertising policies in India, aiming to allow more real-money gaming apps onto its platforms in a bid to settle an ongoing antitrust case with a local online gaming platform WinZO.

On Wednesday, India’s competition watchdog issued a public notice (PDF) inviting comments on a “commitment proposal” from Google, offering to expand access to its Play Store and advertising policy for more real-money gaming apps in the South Asian market.

Google proposed to replace its current pilot program by allowing the distribution of all real-money games in the country — which are “self-declared by developers as permissible online real-money games as per applicable laws/jurisprudence” — on Google Play.

However, the developers are also required to submit proof that an authoritative third-party body has declared the app to be a “game of skill,” the company proposed.

In September 2022, Google launched a pilot program to allow daily fantasy sports and rummy games on its Play Store in India. The move came after a 2021 ruling by India’s Supreme Court that categorized fantasy sports as “games of skill” rather than gambling — and therefore “legal.”

Shortly after the pilot launched, online gaming platform WinZO filed a complaint with India’s antitrust watchdog, calling the program discriminatory for excluding other real-money games. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) took up the case and, in November that year, ordered a formal probe into Google’s policies for real-money gaming apps.

In January last year, Google announced it would expand support for real-money gaming apps on the Play Store in India, Brazil, and Mexico. However, the company paused that rollout in June and stated it would continue to allow apps already included in the 2022 India pilot to remain on the platform.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025

Alongside offering to expand its Play Store for all real-money games self-declared by developers, Google proposed to update its Developer Program Policies to reflect the update. The company also stated that it would finalize an “appropriate business model” for real-money game developers.

Similarly, Google has proposed to allow “games of skill” to be advertised in India where the app maker provides proof by a third-party that it is a game of skill and not gambling.

The recognized third parties in this case could even be industry associations such as the All India Gaming Federation, E-Gaming Federation, or the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports.

Google said it would begin allowing compliant real-money games on its Play Store in India within 120 days of the CCI’s approval, while related ad policy changes would take effect within 150 days of the regulator’s order.

“We’re pleased the CCI is market testing our proposed framework for real-money games (RMGs) in India,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement emailed to TechCrunch. “This development reflects our constructive discussions with the CCI and the Indian developer community along with our commitment to building a more open and safe ecosystem for RMG apps across Google Play and Google Ads.”

Notably, the proposal, if it is accepted by the CCI after public feedback, would benefit Google, which stands to earn a share of revenue from a broader range of real-money gaming apps and their ads on its platforms.

Real-money gaming dominates India’s online gaming market, accounting for nearly 86% of total industry revenue — ₹274.38 billion ($3 billion) in 2024 — per a joint report by WinZO and the Interactive Entertainment and Innovation Council (IEIC) released earlier this year. However, its share is expected to decline slightly to 80% by 2029, as non-real-money games grow in popularity and the overall market expands to ₹785.51 billion ($8.9 billion).

Google’s latest proposal could also offer a boost to developers currently distributing their apps outside the Play Store — including via APK files on their own websites. However, the CCI’s investigation is still ongoing, and the regulator has yet to determine whether Google engaged in discriminatory practices in this space.

The probe adds to a growing list of antitrust challenges for Google in India, where the U.S.-headquartered tech giant has already been fined for allegedly abusing its dominance through Android and the Play Store. The company recently approached the Supreme Court to appeal one of these rulings and contest the CCI’s findings. The case is expected to be listed for hearing next month.

“We look forward to continuing to work with the CCI and the wider RMG ecosystem, and are confident our proposed framework will empower Indian developers, grow the digital economy, and prioritize user safety,” Google’s spokesperson said.

Rivian has filed a lawsuit in Ohio to be able sell its electric vehicles directly to consumers in the state — the latest swing in a perpetual fight between up-and-coming American automakers and the entrenched and powerful dealership lobby.

The company sued the registrar of Ohio’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) on Monday in federal court, claiming the state is harming consumers by blocking direct sales. Rivian is currently able to sell EVs directly to consumers in 25 states and in Washington D.C. Ohio’s BMV did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“Ohio’s prohibition of Rivian’s direct-sales-only business model is irrational in the extreme: it reduces competition, decreases consumer choice, and drives up consumer costs and inconvenience — all of which harm consumers — with literally no countervailing benefit,” lawyers for the company wrote in the complaint.

Rivian is asking the court to allow the company to apply for a dealership license so it can sell vehicles directly. Ohio customers have to buy from Rivian vehicles from locations in other states where direct sales are allowed. The cars are then shipped to Rivian service centers within Ohio.

Allowing Rivian to sell directly would not be treading new legal ground, the company argues in its complaint. Tesla has had a license to sell in Ohio since 2013 and can sell directly to consumers.

What’s stopping Rivian is a 2014 law passed by the state’s legislature. That law, which Rivian says came after an intense lobbying effort by the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association (OADA), effectively gave Tesla a carve-out and blocked any future manufacturers from acquiring the necessary dealership licenses. (OADA did not immediately return a request for comment.)

“Consumer choice is a bedrock principle of America’s economy. Ohio’s archaic prohibition against the direct-sales of vehicles is unconstitutional, irrational, and harms Ohioans by reducing competition and choice and driving up costs and inconvenience,” Mike Callahan, Rivian’s chief administrative officer, said in a statement.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025

Rivian has won legal fights over direct sales before. In 2021, Rivian and Lucid Motors were granted dealership licenses to sell EVs in the state of Illinois. That state’s dealer association sued to try to block Rivian and Lucid from selling directly, but ultimately failed.

Lucid Motors, meanwhile, filed a lawsuit of its own in Texas in 2022 in a challenge to that state’s direct-sales ban. The court ruled against Lucid earlier this year, but the company has appealed, federal court records show.